David Lindgren – We Are Your Tomorrow

“Zelmerlïte”

Tim: We watched the Melodifestivalen final together, Tom, and while the winner was dire (silly Swedes), there were a lot of highlights, so let’s have a few this week. We both had our favourites, and here’s mine, just clinching it ahead of a couple of others.

Tim: Ooh, we’ve got a lot of things going on here. Hand controlled lighting first seen on these pages a couple of years back, but it’s all GREEN with LASERS so it’s automatically better – think my favourite and weirdest movement is at 0:57 when he pulls an imaginary very heavy lever inwards before releasing the beams WIDE OPEN.

Tom: I called this “Discount Måns Zelmerlöw”.

Tim: Zelmerlïte, then.

Tom: Because it’s the same structure, the same down-the-lens look, the same scripted movements and interaction with the set design. He’s even got Måns’ lean with the green lasers.

Tim: You’re not far wrong, I suppose. But speaking of green, David takes inspiration for this performance from, of all possible places, the widely panned 2011 Green Lantern film.

Tom: Wait, what? Really?

Tim: Yes – he says, “I love these movies because they are easy to absorb. It’s quite nice and important to have a background story to the number.” I’ve no idea how that works — I’ve never watched it and have no immediate plans to.

Tom: Don’t.

Tim: Duly noted — but there are parts of this performance I love. There’s the aforementioned gestured lasers, and then the walk forwards through the middle eight, with the fist bump and the hugging reinforcing that message. It’s BANGING and UPBEAT and there’s a big YEAAAAAAAHHHH moment, it’s ALL GREAT.

Tom: And unfortunately, it was done better last year. It is banging and upbeat, yes, but it’s just dialled the cheese a bit too high.

David Lindgren – Move That Thing

Crikey, that kicks in hard.

Tim: The new single release from Melodifestivalen finalist David Lindgren, here, and a healthy dose of EDM for you.

Tom: Crikey, that kicks in hard.

Tim: With the plethora of tracks that get released every month, it takes a lot these days to stand out with tunes of this genre, and to be honest I kind of think this has it. Not enough to be an international breakout, mind, but good enough to get heard on the dance floor fairly regularly. The title on its own, or at least the repetition of it in the chorus, is probably good enough to get some people dancing, and if not then the decent tune underneath it all should do it.

Tom: I’d say it risks getting a bit too repetitive: the trouble with starting off with that level of intensity is there’s not really anywhere for the song to go. Even at three minutes long, I felt it was starting to outstay its welcome. That said, what a welcome.

Tim: The only thing that’s bad is the awful autotune near the beginning; that aside, I rather like this, and would happily RAVE to it.

Tom: Oh, I agree. RAVE ON.